Overpay then invest
£0;
Decision comparison tool
Compare mortgage overpayments with investing spare cash using your mortgage rate, timeframe, return assumption and UK tax wrapper.
All figures are planning estimates only. The calculator does not include early repayment charges, mortgage rate changes mid-term, or unforeseen life events.
;
;
Your result will update as you change the figures.
The page URL captures everything you've entered above. Copy it to come back later or share these inputs with someone.
The result above depends heavily on the mortgage rate and investment return you entered. The grid below shows how the comparison changes across a range of assumptions. Blue favours investing; green favours overpaying. The number is the estimated difference in pounds.
This is the single most useful view in the calculator. If your answer is "invest" but the cell just one row away is "overpay", your conclusion is fragile. If the answer holds across a wide block of the grid, you can be more confident.
How each path develops over time. Mortgage balance falls to zero in both paths; the investment pot builds at different rates.
| Year | Overpay: Mortgage left | Overpay: Invested pot | Invest: Mortgage left | Invest: Invested pot |
|---|
Eight inputs do all the work. The tax wrapper choice is the one most calculators get wrong.
What you owe today and the rate you're currently paying. If you're between fixed deals, use the rate you expect on your next deal.
The remaining term of your mortgage. This is the time horizon the calculator uses for comparison.
Your contractual monthly mortgage payment. If you don't know it, a quick standard amortisation calculator will give it from balance, rate and term.
The amount you have available each month, plus any optional annual lump (a bonus, for example). This is the money being allocated.
A realistic annual return you'd expect on a diversified portfolio. 5-7% is a common range for long-term equity-heavy portfolios; lower if you'd hold more cash or bonds.
ISA, SIPP or General Investment Account. This is what most online comparisons skip ; and it can flip the answer entirely for higher-rate taxpayers.
Only shown for SIPP and GIA. Used to gross up SIPP contributions and to estimate dividend tax drag inside a GIA.
Only shown for SIPP. Used to tax the 75% taxable portion of the pot when you withdraw ; typically lower than your working-age rate.
Two scenarios, same time horizon, same total cash, different choices.
Path A ; Overpay then invest. Every month, your spare cash goes onto the mortgage as overpayment. The mortgage clears earlier than the original term. From the month it clears onwards, the full freed-up contractual payment plus the original spare cash get redirected into investments for the rest of the original term.
Path B ; Invest from day one. Mortgage stays on its contractual schedule. Spare cash goes into investments from the first month. When the mortgage finishes naturally at the end of the term, the freed-up contractual payment gets invested too ; though there's no remaining time for it to compound much.
Both paths use the same total monthly cash outlay. The only difference is the order of operations: pay off cheap-ish debt first, or invest first and let the mortgage run.
This is where almost every online comparison breaks down. The three UK wrappers have very different tax profiles, and one of them turns "invest" from a marginal win into a landslide.
The simple case. Money goes in from after-tax income. Growth and withdrawals are tax-free. The calculator models the pot value as the final spendable amount.
The interesting case. Every £80 you contribute becomes £100 in the pot (20% relief at source). Higher-rate taxpayers can reclaim a further £20 via self-assessment ; which they can re-invest. The calculator grosses up the contribution using net ÷ (1 − marginal rate), then taxes 75% of the withdrawal at your retirement rate.
A general investment account, no tax wrapper. Contributions are post-tax. Dividends are taxed at the dividend rate (10.75%/35.75%/39.35%) and gains over £3,000 a year face CGT (18%/24% for 2026/27). The calculator applies an annual dividend drag and CGT on liquidation.
A 40% taxpayer putting £400/month into a SIPP may get a larger gross pension contribution than the same net amount invested elsewhere. If their retirement tax rate is lower, the pension route can look materially stronger. Run both wrappers and compare rather than assuming ISA and pension results will be similar.
The rate that matters is the one you'll actually pay over the analysis horizon, not necessarily the one you're paying today.
Use your current fixed rate for the remaining fix period. For the analysis horizon, you can either model the fix and assume a sensible reversion or ; simpler ; use a weighted average.
Use your current rate and run the sensitivity grid to see how the answer changes if rates move. The grid is particularly valuable here.
Use the best rate you can realistically get on your next deal. UK fixed mortgage rates have varied between roughly 2% and 6%+ over recent cycles.
No calculator can predict the future. The honest approach is to test a range, which is exactly what the sensitivity grid does.
Closer to a more diversified or bond-heavy portfolio, or a stress-test scenario. Useful for understanding the downside.
The range often used for long-term equity-heavy projections by UK pension regulators and planners. A reasonable central case.
Closer to long-run global equity returns. Reasonable for a 100% equity portfolio held for decades, but not guaranteed ; and the higher the assumption, the more it should be stress-tested.
These are nominal returns, before inflation. If you want to think in real terms, mentally discount them by 2-3% a year ; though doing so for both paths cancels out the inflation effect on the comparison itself.
The arithmetic is one thing. The reasoning around it is another.
Outside an ISA or SIPP, your investment return is taxed. Apples-to-apples means comparing your after-tax return to your mortgage rate.
For a 40% taxpayer, SIPP relief alone can mean every £1 invested becomes £1.67 in the pot. No mortgage overpayment offers anything close to that.
The maths can say "invest" by £40,000 over 25 years, but if a smaller debt-free outcome lets you sleep at night, that has value too.
A paid-off mortgage means a much lower monthly nut if income disappears. A bigger investment pot is great unless the market just fell 30%.
UK mortgages typically re-fix every 2-5 years. Your rate could move significantly. Use the sensitivity grid.
Most UK mortgages allow 10% overpayment per year penalty-free. Above that, you may face a 1-5% charge that the calculator doesn't model.
Even where the maths favours investing, overpaying can be the right answer for the right person.
Overpaying tends to win mathematically when your mortgage rate is high relative to realistic investment returns ; say a 6% mortgage against an assumed 5% return, especially outside a tax wrapper. The sensitivity grid above will show this clearly: a block of green cells in the high-rate, low-return corner.
Overpaying tends to win practically when you're close to retirement (less time for investments to recover from a downturn), when your income is unstable (debt reduction is the bigger risk-management win), when you'd otherwise hold the money in low-yielding savings rather than actually investing it, or when the psychological certainty of clearing debt matters more than a higher expected outcome.
The flip side. For many UK households, investing can look stronger when the expected return is comfortably above the mortgage rate, especially where pension tax relief is involved.
Investing tends to win mathematically when realistic expected returns comfortably exceed your mortgage rate (say 7% returns versus a 4% mortgage), and especially when the investing happens inside an ISA or SIPP. Time matters: the longer you have, the more compound growth amplifies the gap.
Investing can look particularly strong for higher-rate taxpayers using a pension/SIPP, because pension tax relief changes the net cost of contributions. With long timeframes, that can make the investing route more resilient across a range of assumptions.
The questions that come up most often when working through this trade-off.
Should I overpay or invest?
Mathematically, investing tends to win when after-tax expected returns exceed your mortgage rate, particularly inside an ISA or SIPP. Overpaying tends to win in high-rate, low-return scenarios ; and when the certainty of clearing debt is worth more to you than a higher expected outcome.
Why does SIPP do so well?
Because you get tax relief on contributions (effectively up to 25%/67%/82% boost depending on rate band) and only the 75% taxable portion of withdrawals is taxed, often at a lower retirement marginal rate.
What about early repayment charges?
Most UK mortgages allow 10% overpayment per year penalty-free during a fixed term. The calculator doesn't model charges ; check your specific mortgage terms.
Doesn't being debt-free have value too?
Yes ; and it isn't in the maths. If a smaller, debt-free outcome lets you sleep better, that's a legitimate reason to overpay even when investing would win on paper.
Should I always max my SIPP?
Not automatically. Pensions can be tax-efficient, but money is locked up until at least age 55 for most people, rising to 57 from April 2028. If you might need access sooner, an ISA may be more flexible.
What's the sensitivity grid for?
To check whether your answer is robust. If the grid shows a wide block of cells favouring the same path around your inputs, you can be more confident. If your cell is one step from a flipped result, your conclusion is fragile.
Last reviewed: 19 May 2026. The calculator uses current 2026/27 UK dividend tax rates and published pension/ISA assumptions where tax wrappers are selected.
Primary sources: GOV.UK ISA rules, GOV.UK dividend tax rates, GOV.UK Capital Gains Tax rates, and GOV.UK pension scheme rates.